The country is moving toward fascism. We see the current administration dismantling beneficial social and environmental programs while expanding repressive police and military functions of government. Resistance is our only hope, for what we tolerate is what we get. Besides, standing up to institutional Powers that would destroy life is the right thing to do. “In times of tyranny, the only way to maintain our humanity is to resist.”
One form of resistance is to expose the ideologies that provide a foundation for tyranny. Today I critique the theology of the Religious Right, which wields tremendous power in the Republican Party and was able to influence so many white Evangelicals to vote for Donald Trump. My primary purpose today is to refute the “theological sadism” that tolerates and furthers suffering while explaining it away in religious terms. As theologian Dorothy Solle said, “That explanation of suffering that looks away from the victim and identifies itself with a righteousness that is supposed to stand behind the suffering has already taken a step in the direction of theological sadism, which wants to understand God as the torturer.”
Religious justifications that support cruelty, abuse, exclusion, and hierarchical domination are based on a faulty understanding of who God is and why Jesus died. Did God send Jesus to die on the cross? Was this God’s original plan to save people who believe in this story from going to hell? Is the suffering of Jesus on the cross a pattern that we are to follow by accepting our lot in life? I say NO, as do most feminist and other liberation theologians.
The idea that human beings need to be reconciled through blood sacrifice to a wrathful God is basic to conservative Christianity and is reflected in popular culture. A scene from the movie The Apostle illustrates this view. At the high point of the movie, the main character, a preacher played by Robert Duvall, holds up a baby in front of the congregation and says, “Could I ever drive a nail through the hand of this precious baby? I couldn’t, but God could. That’s what God did for you and me.”
Mel Gibson’s The Passion of Christ, criticized for its gratuitous violence and anti-Semitism, portrays a similar message through its unrelenting scenes of the sadistic torture of a passive and miserable Jesus. The point? That Jesus went through all this suffering (yes, it was God’s plan) in order to save you and me.
But this view substitutes a dogma about Jesus for the reality of Jesus’ life and teachings, and the events that led to his death. It makes the death of Jesus acceptable, and takes away the “scandal of the cross.”
If I stand by, approving the execution of Jesus as a human sacrifice given in my place to a judgmental God, I stand with the High Priest Caiaphas, who argued that it was “expedient for one man to die for the people.” If I applaud the crucifixion of Jesus as a good plan, even God’s plan, I place God on the side of the Roman Empire, which crucified subversives, including Jesus, as a matter of course, just as governments execute subversives today. If I collaborate with those who put Jesus to death by justifying his murder on religious grounds, with theories of why blood needed to be spilt, I put myself on the side of the blood-thirsty mobs who called for Jesus to be crucified and who have engaged in atrocities throughout history. If I ignore the political context and accept the execution of Jesus as a predetermined event that happened just as God intended, the symbol of the cross becomes a sign of God’s approval of the status quo rather than a symbol of hope for transformation of the world.
Follow Sharon’s blog by clicking the “Follow Sharon Delgado” button at the right or by “liking” Sharon’s Facebook Page.